Cases 1 - 10 of 24
JOHNSON v. KNIGHT
as 1:2019cv03231
Petitioner:
CHARLES JOHNSON
Respondent:
STAN KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HALL et al v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2019cv01361
Defendant:
TOMAW, CHUCK PENFOLD, WEXFORD OF INDIANA and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA L. HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NICCUM v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2018cv00004
Respondent:
STAN KNIGHT
Petitioner:
JOHN NICCUM
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stafford v. Knight et al
as 3:2017cv00228
Plaintiff:
James Blair Stafford
Defendant:
Stan Knight, Craig Grage and Kathy Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAMBREL v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv00503
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CROW, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
NORMAN GAMBREL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURDEN v. KELLY et al
as 1:2016cv03105
Plaintiff:
KENNETH BURDEN
Defendant:
KELLY, STAN KNIGHT and PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENNY v. KNIGHT
as 1:2016cv02921
Petitioner:
TYRONE DENNY
Respondent:
STAN KNIGHT
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DENNY v. KNIGHT
as 1:2016cv02919
Petitioner:
TYRONE DENNY
Respondent:
STAN KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DENNY v. KNIGHT
as 1:2016cv02920
Petitioner:
TYRONE DENNY
Respondent:
STAN KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DENNY v. KNIGHT
as 1:2016cv02923
Petitioner:
TYRONE DENNY
Respondent:
STAN KNIGHT
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
