Cases 1 - 10 of 22
LAWLER v. STANCIL et al
as 2:2022cv03801
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LAWLER
Defendant:
KYLE STANCIL, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle
STANCIL v. COMMONWEALTH et al
as 2:2021cv05471
Petitioner:
WILLIAM STANCIL
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF:
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burch v. Stancil
as 4:2021cv01992
Plaintiff:
Petrick L Burch
Defendant:
M.A. Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PAULSON v. BURKE et al
as 2:2020cv03678
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL W. PAULSON
Defendant:
R. STANCILL, TERRY BURKE, DON BEES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STANCIL v. ASTRAZENCA LP et al
as 2:2020cv02496
Defendant:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals L P and ASTRAZENCA LP
Plaintiff:
Thedell Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STANCIL v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv11663
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA STANCIL
In Re:
PROTON PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parshall v. National Commerce Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00379
Defendant:
Stephen A. Sevigny, Temple W. Tutwiler, III, Thomas H. Coley and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Bushansky v. National Commerce Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00355
Defendant:
Stephen A. Sevigny, Temple W. Tutwiler, III, Thomas H. Coley and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Burch v. Stancil
as 3:2018cv02336
Respondent:
M.A. Stancil
Petitioner:
Patrick Burch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FABOR-STANCIL v. CUTTER CANDLES et al
as 2:2013cv04222
Plaintiff:
KAREN FABOR-STANCIL
Defendant:
CUTTER CANDLES , SPECTRUM BRANDS DIVISION OF UNITED INDUSTRIES CORP. , CHEMISCO DIVISION OF UNITED INDUSTRIES CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
