Cases filed in New Jersey
RAHHAL et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv11749
Plaintiff: KATHRYN RAHHAL and THE ESTATE OF MARILYN STANFIELD
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STEVENSON v. JACKSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv18970
Plaintiff: MARLIN STEVENSON
Defendant: CARL JACKSON, AUGUSTINO and MR. STANFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BONET v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY et al
as 1:2018cv11794
Defendant: JEAN E. STANFIELD, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, STERN & EISENBERG, PC and others
Plaintiff: EMILIO JEREMIAH BONET
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FUSCHETTO v. FOSTER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv05485
Plaintiff: DONNA LYNN FUSCHETTO
Defendant: JOSEPH L. FOSTER, OREN THOMAS, JMC, JENNIFER VELEZ, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEMP BEY et al v. ARTIS et al
as 3:2013cv02695
Petitioner: DWAYNE KEMP BEY and RICHARD DIXON BEY
Respondent: LAWRENCE ARTIS, BURLINGTON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JEROME B. SIMANDLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00913
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
IBEH v. CITY OF BURLINGTON et al
as 1:2009cv00718
Plaintiff: EUNICE IBEH
Defendant: CITY OF BURLINGTON, STEPHEN FAZEKAS, JEAN STANFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BERNARD v. STANFIELD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv03394
Plaintiff: FARLEY L. BERNARD
Defendant: JEAN E. STANFIELD, TRANS-CARE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY and BURLINGTON COUNTY SHERRIF DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?