Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1689
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Karimpour v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11498
Plaintiff:
Amin Karimpour and Pro se Litigant Amin Karimpour
Defendant:
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Rhonda Gass and Joseph Pereira
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv12230
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DELOGE et al v. WAL-MART STORES INC et al
as 1:2017cv00361
Plaintiff:
THERESA L DELOGE and RICKEY DELOGE
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES INC and STANLEY BLACK & DECKER INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
A.J. Properties, LLC v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
as 16-1236
Plaintiff - Appellant:
A.J. PROPERTIES, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC.
Interested Party:
LEON RESNICK
Hamilton v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
as 1:2015cv13368
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A Hamilton
Defendant:
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lara et al v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv12231
Defendant:
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. , Farrel Corporation and Rubber City Machinery Corp.
Plaintiff:
Vicente Lara and Mary Lara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Houpert v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv11512
Plaintiff:
Richard Houpert
Defendant:
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Happy Madison, Inc., Happy Madison Productions and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Norman et al v. Rockler Companies, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv11633
Plaintiff:
Paul Norman and Sandra Simpson
Defendant:
Rockler Companies, Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
A.J. Properties, LLC v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
as 4:2011cv10835
Plaintiff:
A.J. Properties, LLC
Defendant:
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
