Cases 61 - 70 of 73
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv07424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv07369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MELDOFSKY v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv07226
Plaintiff:
DAVID MELDOFSKY
Defendant:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION, MICHAEL AXELROD, ROBERT STEFANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
ZORANSKI et al v. STARBUCKS et al
as 1:2011cv03519
Plaintiff:
MARIE ZORANSKI and EDWARD ZORANSKI
Defendant:
STARBUCKS, STARBUCKS CORPORATION, STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BENDINSKY v. STARBUCKS et al
as 5:2010cv04553
Plaintiff:
LEONARD BENDINSKY
Defendant:
STARBUCKS and STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STANBERY HAMILTON, LLC v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION
as 3:2009cv05057
Plaintiff:
STANBERY HAMILTON, LLC
Defendant:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
DAIBES GAS 18, LLC v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv03931
Plaintiff:
DAIBES GAS 18, LLC
Defendant:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
RARITAN VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER II,LLC v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION
as 3:2009cv03308
Plaintiff:
RARITAN VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER II,LLC
Defendant:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
GOLDSTEIN et al v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv00643
Plaintiff:
JOY GOLDSTEIN and BRIAN GOLDSTEIN
Defendant:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION, STARBUCKS CORPORATION 1 and STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BLOCK v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv01956
Plaintiff:
JULIA BLOCK
Defendant:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION and DOES 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
