Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Bartel et al v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 2:2022at00122
Plaintiff:
Amanda Bartel and David Bartel
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Pactiv Packaging, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bartel et al v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Amanda Bartel and David Bartel
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Pactiv Packaging, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Vargas v. Target Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv02397
Defendant:
Target Corporation, Starbucks Corporation and Promesa Wilson
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Suzanna Sukiasyan v. Target Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv10356
Defendant:
Target Corporation, Starbucks Corporation and Does 1 to 12
Plaintiff:
Suzanna Sukiasyan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Long v. Starbucks Corporation
as 3:2018cv02171
Plaintiff:
Sandra L. Long
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rafi Haroutounian v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv02422
Defendant:
DOES and Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff:
Rafi Haroutounian
Paharia v. Starbucks Corporation
as 3:2016cv04600
Plaintiff:
Neeru Paharia
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ellis v. Starbucks Corporation
as 3:2015cv03451
Plaintiff:
Yosha Ellis
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amy Wels-v-Starbucks Corp.
as 3:2014cv00200
Plaintiff:
Amy Wels
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Connie Rivera et al v. Target Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv00909
Plaintiff:
Connie Rivera, Connie Rivera, Anthony Macias and others
Defendant:
Target Corporation, Target Corporation, Starbucks Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
