Cases 11 - 20 of 20,704
Wheeler et al v. State of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03933
Plaintiff:
Rev. Wheeler, Jr., Mamie Till Mobley and Tyrone Hunt
Defendant:
The State of Chicago and The State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Negron v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv03939
Plaintiff:
Willie Negron
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Kacar v. City of Skokie et al
as 1:2024cv03894
Plaintiff:
Faruk Kacar
Defendant:
City of Skokie, City Of Chicago and State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03847
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Few v. San Jose Police Dept. et al
as 1:2024cv03832
Plaintiff:
Jenessia Few
Defendant:
San Jose Police Dept., Cynthia Beltran-Hahn, Trent Tessler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Vinet v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2024cv03807
Petitioner:
Richard J. Vinet
Respondent:
State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Woodard v. Illinois
as 3:2024cv01251
Petitioner:
Anthony Thomas Dewayne Woodard and Anthony D Woodard
Defendant:
People of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wachter v. Nickel et al
as 3:2024cv01249
Plaintiff:
Marc Wachter
Defendant:
Andrew Nickel and State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
