Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Slakman v. State Board of Pardons & Paroles et al
as 1:2020cv04822
Defendant:
Chairman of State Board Pardons & Paroles, State Board of Pardons & Paroles and Terry E. Barnard
Plaintiff:
Barry Slakman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rufus v. Courts of the United States et al
as 3:2020cv00695
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Courts of the United States, Horace Johnson, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Alonza Rufus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. State Board of Pardons & Paroles et al
as 1:2020cv01696
Respondent:
State Board of Pardons & Paroles, Jacquline Bunn, Esq,, United States District Court, Georgia and others
Petitioner:
Randy Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Beason v. Texas State Board of Pardons/Paroles
as 6:2020cv00015
Defendant:
Texas State Board of Pardons/Paroles
Plaintiff:
Terry Len Beason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pugh v. Elmore et al
as 1:2017cv04269
Plaintiff:
Anthony G. Pugh
Defendant:
Ann Elmore, John Lloyd, James Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. State Board of Pardon & Paroles et al
as 1:2016cv04261
Petitioner:
Daniel W. Taylor
Respondent:
State Board of Pardon & Paroles and Jose Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Flood v. Morales et al
as 4:2016cv00223
Petitioner:
Mantoine Flood
Respondent:
Jose Morales and State Board of Pardons & Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Burton et al v. State Bar of Georgia et al
as 1:2012cv01501
Plaintiff:
Eddie James Burton
Defendant:
State Bar of Georgia, Paula J. Frederick, John J. Shiptenko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. State Board of Pardons & Paroles et al
as 1:2011cv01204
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Veondi Parks
Defendant:
State Board of Pardons & Paroles, L. Gale Buckner, Robert Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
