Cases 51 - 60 of 148
RUFUS v. STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
as 3:2018cv00111
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Respondent:
STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Merilien v. Georgia State Board of Pardons And Paroles
as 1:2018cv03241
Defendant:
Georgia State Board of Pardons And Paroles
Plaintiff:
Jean Jocelyn Merilien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Lawson et al
as 2:2018cv00044
Plaintiff:
Alton W. Brown
Defendant:
Michael Lawson, John Roberts, Debra Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mark Kerlin v. Terry Barnard, et al
as 18-11221
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK KERLIN
Respondent - Appellee:
TERRY BARNARD, Chairman, JAMES MILLS, Vice Chairman, BRAXTON COTTON, Member and others
Watkins v. The State Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2018cv00770
Plaintiff:
Segral Seville Watkins
Defendant:
The State Board of Pardons and Paroles, James W. Mills, Braxton T. Cotton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker, Jr v. Harris County District Attorney et al
as 6:2018cv00010
Petitioner:
Roger Lee Baker, Jr
Respondent:
Harris County District Attorney, Talbot County Superior Court, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clarke v. Dozier et al
as 1:2017cv03803
Petitioner:
Jerome Clarke
Respondent:
Gregory C. Dozier, Antoine Caldwell, Terry E. Barnard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Rufus v. State Board of Pardons
as 17-14081
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BAKER v. GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 5:2017cv00263
Petitioner:
RODERICK DOUGLASS BAKER
Respondent:
GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, TERRY E BARNARD, NATHAN DEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
