Cases 41 - 50 of 481
State of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-1081
Petitioner:
State of Ohio, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Two Hundred for Housing Equity, Americans for Tax Reform, American Commitment and others
Not Yet Classified:
ConservAmerica
McShane v. Attorney General for the State of Delaware
as 1:2022mc00212
Plaintiff:
Anne McShane
Defendant:
Attorney General for the State of Delaware
State of California et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2022cv02583
Plaintiff:
State of California, State of New York, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Louis DeJoy
Intervenor Defendant:
Oshkosh Defense, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
David WebbIn re: David Webb
as 22-1708
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID Q. WEBB
Respondent:
CITY OF WILMINGTON, Government, NEW CASTLE COUNTY, Government, MICHAEL S. PURZYCKI, Mayor and others
State of Delaware v. BP America Inc, et al
as 22-1096
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF DELAWARE, ex rel. Kathleen Jennings, Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Defendant / Appellant:
BP AMERICA INC, BP PLC, CHEVRON CORP and others
Appellant:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES, UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS, PUBLIC CITIZEN INC and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-96
Petitioner:
Mortimer-Side Initial Covered Sackler Persons
Respondent:
State of California, People of the State of California, by and through Attorney General Rob Bonta, State of Connecticut and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-90
Petitioner:
Ad Hoc Committee of Governmental and Other Contingent Litigation Claimants
Respondent:
State of California, People of the State of California, by and through Attorney General Rob Bonta, State of Connecticut and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-97
Petitioner:
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Purdue Pharma L.P., et al. and Ad Hoc Group of Individual Victims of Purdue Pharma, L.P.
Respondent:
The State of Washington, The District of Columbia, The City of Grande Prairie, as Representative Plaintiff for a Class Consisting of All Canadian Municipalities, the Cities of Brantford, Grand Prairie, Lethbridge, and Wetaskiwin and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-85
Petitioner:
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Purdue Pharma L.P., et al., Purdue Pharma, L. P., Purdue Pharma Inc and others
Respondent:
The State of Washington, State of Maryland, District of Columbia and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-94
Petitioner:
The Raymond Sackler Family and Raymond Sackler Family/Side B of the Sackler Family
Respondent:
The State of Washington, State of Maryland, District of Columbia and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
