Cases 1 - 10 of 4,756
Salis v. New York State Bar Association
as 24-1066
Plaintiff:
OWOLABI SALIS
Defendant:
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, DONALD ZOLIN, KEVIN J. DOYLE and others
Brown v. State of New York
as 9:2024cv00559
Petitioner:
Leon A. Brown, Jr.
Respondent:
State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holtec International et al v. The State Of New York
as 1:2024cv02929
Plaintiff:
Holtec International, Holtec Indian Point 2, LLC, Holtec Indian Point 3, LLC and others
Defendant:
The State Of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dj Fed. Question: Declaratory Judgment
Govan v. The State of New York
as 1:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Kwauhuru Govan
Defendant:
The State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02969
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Flores
Defendant:
The State of New York, Department of Corrections Community Supervision, Officer S. Mentigny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manko v. Lenox Hill Hospital
as 24-954
Plaintiff:
NELLA MANKO
Defendant:
LENOX HILL HOSPITAL, DANA A. MANNOR, M.D., NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM and others
Pierre-Lys v. State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02759
Petitioner:
Roodolph L. Pierre-Lys
Respondent:
State of New York and Amy Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sibley v. Watches
as 24-855
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY
Defendant:
CHAUNCEY J. WATCHES, KATHLEEN HOCHUL, LETITIA JAMES and others
Shomo v. State of New York
as 24-818
Plaintiff:
JOSE SHOMO
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, STEWART ECKERT, Superintendent, individually and in official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
