Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MURRAY-BEY v. JONES et al
as 3:2024cv05738
Plaintiff:
DANNY-R: MURRAY-BEY
Defendant:
RODERICK JONES and NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BURK v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2019cv09261
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
ISHMAEL A. BURK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAWKINS v. OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2018cv11174
Defendant:
BRIDGETON STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CUMBERLAND COUNTY COURTHOUSE, OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC K. DAWKINS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. MDOT MOTOR VEHICLE ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2018cv09542
Plaintiff:
RONNIE COLEMAN, JR.
Defendant:
MDOT MOTOR VEHICLE ADMINISTRATION and STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT BARRACK Q
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AIKENS v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 2:2017cv03161
Plaintiff:
ERIC S. AIKENS
Defendant:
JEOVANNY RODRIGUEZ, RONALD MICUCCI, AARON AUCLAIR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAUNDERS v. SANNA et al
as 3:2016cv06560
Plaintiff:
TERRY L. SAUNDERS
Defendant:
RONALD J. SANNA, AARON AUCLAIR, JOHN WEBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCDOWELL v. BUENA VISTA STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2014cv07875
Plaintiff:
RANDY N. MCDOWELL
Defendant:
BUENA VISTA STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS v. NEWARK CITY, et al
as 2:2014cv00120
Plaintiff:
LEE EVANS
Defendant:
Former Mayor, CORY A. BOOKER , Officer JOE HADLEY, Detective RASHID SABUR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS v. NEWARK CITY, et al
as 2:2014cv00121
Plaintiff:
LEE EVANS
Defendant:
Former Mayor, CORY A. BOOKER , Officer JOE HADLEY, Detective RASHID SABUR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
