Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Parks v. U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Atlanta Div. et al
as 1:2020cv00598
Defendant:
Scott Buchanan and Paulette Buchanan, Pectol And Miles, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Atlanta Div. and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Floyd Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raimo v. Carr
as 1:2019cv04274
Respondent:
State of Connecticut and Christopher Carr
Petitioner:
Tamir Raimo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United States of America, ex rel. et al v. MBM Solutions L.L.C., et al
as 1:2019cv01833
Defendant:
John Doe, MBM Solutions L.L.C. doing business as Avada Health, Cliff and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel., State of Alaska, ex rel., State of California, ex rel. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America, ex. rel. et al v. Pediatric Services of America, Inc.
as 4:2016cv00102
Plaintiff:
United States of America ex rel. , State of Georgia, ex. rel. , State of California, ex. rel. and others
Defendant:
Pediatric Services of America, Inc., Pediatric Services of America, Pediatric Healthcare Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America ex rel. et al v. Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01250
Plaintiff:
United States of America ex rel., Duane R. Arnold, Mark A. Shipman and others
Defendant:
Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
United States of America ex rel. v. Rite Aid Corporation
as 1:2012cv02431
Plaintiff:
United States of America Ex Rel, State of California, ex rel., State of Colorado, ex rel. and others
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation, 112 Burleigh Avenue Norfolk, LLC, 1515 West State Street Boise, Idaho, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Amun Re El v. State of Connecticut Et Al
as 1:2011mi00047
Plaintiff:
Jaame Amun Re El
Defendant:
State of Connecticut Et Al
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
