Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Whitlock v. State of Georgia, Department of Juvenile Justice et al
as 4:2013cv00296
Plaintiff:
Morgan Leighann Whitlock
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Department of Juvenile Justice , Maeretha Alexander , Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Hice et al
as 2:2011cv00123
Plaintiff:
Samuel G. Johnson
Defendant:
Avery Hice, Joan Stuart, Kathy Henson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Wright v. Washington et al
as 1:2011cv01597
Petitioner:
Gerald Wright
Respondent:
Anthony Washington, Herbert (Buzz) Franklin, State of Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wright v. Washington et al
as 4:2011cv00139
Petitioner:
Gerald Wright
Respondent:
Anthony Washington, Herbert (Buzz) Franklin, State of Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hill v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv01490
Plaintiff:
Michael James Hill
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and State of Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Re El v. State of Georgia
as 1:2011mi00031
Plaintiff:
Jaame-Amun Re El
Defendant:
State of Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
El Bey v. State of Georgia
as 1:2011mi00029
Plaintiff:
Xaa'el Kepheri Heru El Bey
Defendant:
State of Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
El v. State of Georgia
as 1:2011mi00030
Plaintiff:
Sh'toolah El
Defendant:
State of Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
