Cases 21 - 30 of 4,905
Palmer v. Garrett, et al.
as 24-2175
Petitioner:
MARKIECE PALMER
Respondent:
TIM GARRETT and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Conners v. Filson, et al.
as 24-2170
Petitioner:
DARRELL CONNERS
Respondent:
TIMOTHY FILSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Stewart v. Oliver, et al.
as 24-2168
Petitioner:
TOMMY LAQUADE STEWART
Respondent:
RONALD OLIVER, GABRIELA NAJERA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Alvarez v. Wolfson et al
as 3:2024cv00162
Petitioner:
Leo Lionel Alvarez
Respondent:
Steve B. Wolfson and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. District Attorney Joshua Judd
as 2:2024cv00679
Petitioner:
Michael Brooks
Respondent:
District Attorney Joshua Judd and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wheeler v. Brager et al
as 2:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
Antonio Wheeler
Defendant:
Susan Brager, Lawrence L. Brown, III, Chris Giunchigliani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collins v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Timothy G. Collins
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Nevada Department of Corrections, John Henley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Choate v. Williams, et al.
as 24-1911
Petitioner:
STEPHEN LEE CHOATE
Respondent:
WILLIAMS, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Polk v. The State of Nevada et al
as 2:2024cv00625
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Polk
Defendant:
The State of Nevada, The Supreme Court of the State of Nevada, The Nevada Board of Bar Examiners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Polk v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2024cv00634
Petitioner:
Gerald Jerome Polk
Respondent:
State of Nevada and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
