Cases 31 - 40 of 41
State of North Dakota, et al v. Scott Pruitt, et al
as 15-15894
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SIERRA CLUB and NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF ARIZONA, COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, Energy and Environment Cabinet and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT PRUITT, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and REGINA MCCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae:
STATES OF NEBRASKA, ALABAMA, ALASKA, ARKANSAS, FLORIDA, GEORGIA, IDAHO, INDIANA, KANSAS, LOUISIANA, MICHIGAN, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA, WEST VIRGINIA, WISCONSIN AND WYOMING.
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY D/B/A AMEREN MISSOURI
Kuklok v. State of North Dakota,Workforce Safety and Insurance
as 3:2014cv03480
Plaintiff:
Brendan Kuklok
Defendant:
State of North Dakota,Workforce Safety and Insurance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Kuklok v. State of North Dakota et al
as 3:2014cv03450
Plaintiff:
Brendan Kuklok
Defendant:
State of North Dakota and Workforce Safety and Insurance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2014md02521
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Local 17 Hospitality Benefit Fund and others
Defendant:
Teikoku Pharma USA, Teikoku Seiyaku Co, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc and others
Not Classified By Court:
All Parties, Express Scripts, Inc., Caremark, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 4:2012mc80286
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of Alabama , State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation , Bank of America, N.A. , Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and others
The State of California et al v. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05229
Plaintiff:
The State of California , The State of Arizona , The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation and Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o et al v. Toshiba Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05230
Plaintiff:
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o , The State of Arizona by its Attorney GeneralTom Horne , The State of Arkansas by its Attorney General Dustin McDaniel and others
Defendant:
Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 3:2012cv05231
Plaintiff:
The State of California , The State of Arizona , The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Hitachi, Ltd. and Hitachi America, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California et al v. Winbond Electronics Co.
as 3:2007cv02589
Plaintiff:
The State of California, The State of Alaska, The State of Arizona and others
Defendant:
Winbond Electronics Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State of California et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
as 4:2007cv01347
Plaintiff:
State of California, State of Alaska, State of Arizona and others
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
