Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Paul Eknes-Tucker, et al v. Governor of the State of Alabama, et al
as 22-11707
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PAUL A. EKNES-TUCKER, BRIANNA BOE, JAMES ZOE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, FOR CULLMAN COUNTY and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
LAURA BECKER, BILLY BURLEIGH, HELENA KERSCHNER and others
Not Classified By Court:
AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION and ETHICS AND PUBLIC POLICY CENTER
State of Florida et al v. Walensky et al
as 8:2022cv00718
Plaintiff:
STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Defendant:
ROCHELLE P WALENSKY, CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, SHERRI A BERGER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
The State of Alabama et al v. United States Department of Commerce et al
as 3:2021cv00211
Defendant:
United States Department of Commerce, Ron Jarmin, United States Bureau of the Census and others
Plaintiff:
William Green, Robert Aderholt, The State of Alabama and others
Amicus Curiae:
Aleksandra Slavkovic, State of Utah, Aaron Roth and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
People First of Alabama, et al v. Secretary of State, et al
as 20-13695
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BLACK VOTERS MATTER CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE, GREATER BIRMINGHAM MINISTRIES, HOWARD PORTER, JR. and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Defendant / Appellant:
DON DAVIS, SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF TEXAS and others
The New Georgia Project, et al v. Brad Raffensperger, et al
as 20-13360
Defendant / Appellant:
AHN LE, in their official capacities as Members of the Georgia State Election Board, DAVID J. WORLEY, BRAD RAFFENSPERGER, in his official capacity as the Georgia Secretary of State and the Chair of the Georgia State Election Board and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BEVERLY PYNE, CANDACE WOODALL, REAGAN JENNINGS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Yashica Robinson, et al v. Attorney General, State of Ala, et al
as 20-11401
Defendant / Appellant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and SCOTT HARRIS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
YASHICA ROBINSON, ALABAMA WOMEN'S CENTER, WEST ALABAMA WOMEN'S CENTER and others
Not Classified By Court:
AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, SERVICE, SISTERSONG WOMEN OF COLOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE COLLECTIVE and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF DELAWARE, STATE OF VERMONT, STATE OF KENTUCKY and others
United States of America ex rel. et al Nix v. United Biologics, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01486
Defendant:
United Biologics, LLC doing business as United Allergy Services formerly known as United Allergy Labs, United Allergy Labs, Decatur Pediatric Group, P.A. and others
Petitioner:
Bothwell Law Group, P.C., Mike Bothwell and Bothwell Bracker P.C.
Plaintiff:
United States of America ex rel., State of California ex rel., State of Colorado ex rel. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America ex rel. et al v. Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01250
Plaintiff:
United States of America ex rel., Duane R. Arnold, Mark A. Shipman and others
Defendant:
Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
United States of America et al v. Healogics, Inc.
as 6:2014cv00283
Defendant:
UF Health, Orlando Health, IU Health Goshen Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Luckett et al
as 8:2015cv01176
Plaintiff:
Ruth Luckett and Ellen Bordas
Movant:
United States of America , State of California, State of Colorado and others
Defendant:
WellCare Health Plans, Inc., Comprehensive Health Management, Inc., Easy Choice Health Plan, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
