Cases 41 - 50 of 915
Prestel v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dean Prestel
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, County of Mcintosh, Kevin Ledbetter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sjodin v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Kirk Ardell Sjodin, Jr
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prestel v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 3:2023cv00518
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dean Prestel
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, County of Mcintosh, Kevin Ledbetter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Bridges
as 6:2023cv00049
Petitioner:
Darvin W. Gray
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma and Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gray v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
Darvin W. Gray
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Black v. Christian et al
as 6:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Preston Miles Black
Defendant:
John Christian, Unknown or all other Contractors, Pontotoc County Court Clerk's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sweet v. Christian et al
as 6:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Steven Jacob Sweet
Defendant:
John Christian, State of Oklahoma, City of Ada Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Farris
as 4:2022cv00567
Petitioner:
Antonio Leon Ellis
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma, The and Jim Farris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. State of Oklahoma
as 22-6213
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEVE O'NEAL GREEN
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Hedgpeth v. Pettigrew
as 6:2022cv00377
Petitioner:
Gary Hedgpeth
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma and Luke Pettigrew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
