Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 311
Shibahara v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2023cv01272
Plaintiff: Elizabeth K. Shibahara
Defendant: State of Oregon, Holly Catalina, Laura Ramirez Marin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scriber v. Peters, et al.
as 23-1503
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALYSHA SCRIBER
Defendant / Appellee: COLETTE PETERS, Oregon Department of Corrections (ODOC) Director, BRIAN BELLEQUE, ODOC Deputy Director (former), ROB PERSSON, Superintendent CCCF (former) and others
Defendant: JOHN/JANE DOE 1, Assistant Superintendent of Security (CCCF), JOHN/JANE DOE 2, 110, Security Staff, JOHN/JANE DOE 3, 1120, ODOC/CCCF Correctional Officers and others
Daniel Azzopardi, et al v. Ellen Rosenblum, et al
as 23-35479
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL AZZOPARDI and SPORTSMAN'S WAREHOUSE INC.
Defendant / Appellee: ELLEN ROSENBLUM, In her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oregon and TERRI DAVIE, In her official capacity as Superintendent of the Oregon State Police
Mark Fitz, et al v. Ellen Rosenblum, et al
as 23-35478
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARK FITZ, GRAYGUNS, INC., G4 ARCHERY, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee: ELLEN ROSENBLUM, In her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oregon and TERRI DAVIE, In her official capacity as Superintendent of the Oregon State Police
State of Oregon, et al v. USDC-ORP, et alIn re: State of Oregon, et al v. USDC-ORP, et al
as 23-70127
Not Classified By Court: In re: STATE OF OREGON
Petitioner: STATE OF OREGON
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Plaintiff: PAUL JULIAN MANEY, GARY CLIFT, GEORGE W. NULPH and others
Defendant: PATRICK ALLEN
United States of America et al v. City of Sandy, Oregon
as 3:2023cv00968
Plaintiff: United States of America and State of Oregon, by and Through Department of Environmental Quality
Defendant: City of Sandy, Oregon
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Linthicum et al v. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00834
Plaintiff: Dennis Linthicum and Anthony Intiso
Defendant: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, The State of Oregon, The State of California and others
State of Washington, et al v. FDA, et al
as 23-35294
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF OREGON, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ROBERT M. CALIFF, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Petitioner / Appellant: STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF IOWA, STATE OF MONTANA and others
State of Washington et al v. United States Food and Drug Administration et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv03026
Plaintiff: State of Washington, State of Oregon, State of Arizona and others
Defendant: United States Food and Drug Administration, Robert M Califf, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: State of Idaho, State of Iowa, State of Montana and others
Amicus Curiae: Legal Voice, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association and others
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
American Apparel & Footwear Association, Inc., et al v. Dave Baden, et al
as 23-35114
Plaintiff / Appellant: AMERICAN APPAREL & FOOTWEAR ASSOCIATION, INC., HALLOWEEN INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, INC., JUVENILE PRODUCTS MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee: JAMES SCHROEDER, in his official capacity as Interim Director of the Oregon Health Authority, ELLEN ROSENBLUM, in her official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Oregons Department of Justice and DAVE BADEN, in his official capacity as Interim Director of the Oregon Health Authority

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?