Cases 1 - 10 of 69
State Of New York et al v. Donald Trump et al
as 1:2017cv05228
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Washington, State of New Mexico and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States of America, Donald Trump and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County (LASSMC), Service Employees International Union, African Services Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of California v. United States Department of En
as 21-108
Petitioner:
State of Maine, State of Michigan, State of California and others
Respondent:
United States Department of Energy, Dan Brouillette, Secretary, United States Department of Energy and Jennifer M. Granholm, Secretary, United States Department of Energy
National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc. v. James
as 22-1374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc., Beretta U.S.A. Corp., Davidson's, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Letitia James, in her official capacity as New York Attorney General
Amicus Curiae:
Montana, National Rifle Association of America, City of New York and others
Petitioner:
Ryan Bussee
Soule v. Connecticut Association of Sch
as 21-1365
Defendant / Appellee:
Danbury Public Schools Board of Education, Glastonbury Public Schools Board of Education, Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Chelsea Mitchell, a minor, by Christina Mitchell, her mother, Alanna Smith, a minor, by Cheryl Radachowsky, her mother, Ashley Nicoletti, a minor, by Jennifer Nicoletti, her mother and others
Petitioner:
Business Executives
Amicus Curiae:
American Academy of Pediatrics, Hezekiah Beardsley Connecticut Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, New York State American Academy of Pediatrics and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-116
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-96
Petitioner:
Mortimer-Side Initial Covered Sackler Persons
Respondent:
State of California, People of the State of California, by and through Attorney General Rob Bonta, State of Connecticut and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-90
Petitioner:
Ad Hoc Committee of Governmental and Other Contingent Litigation Claimants
Respondent:
State of California, People of the State of California, by and through Attorney General Rob Bonta, State of Connecticut and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-97
Petitioner:
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Purdue Pharma L.P., et al. and Ad Hoc Group of Individual Victims of Purdue Pharma, L.P.
Respondent:
The State of Washington, The District of Columbia, The City of Grande Prairie, as Representative Plaintiff for a Class Consisting of All Canadian Municipalities, the Cities of Brantford, Grand Prairie, Lethbridge, and Wetaskiwin and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-85
Petitioner:
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Purdue Pharma L.P., et al., Purdue Pharma, L. P., Purdue Pharma Inc and others
Respondent:
The State of Washington, State of Maryland, District of Columbia and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-94
Petitioner:
The Raymond Sackler Family and Raymond Sackler Family/Side B of the Sackler Family
Respondent:
The State of Washington, State of Maryland, District of Columbia and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
