Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Staples v. Dewalt et al
as 5:2008cv03159
Petitioner:
William Staples
Respondent:
Stephen Dewalt, Bureau of Prisons and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Belcher v. Dewalt
as 5:2008cv00216
Petitioner:
Stephen Cortez Belcher
Respondent:
Stephen Dewalt
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Staples v. Dewalt et al
as 5:2008cv00172
Petitioner:
William Staples
Respondent:
Stephen Dewalt, Bureau of Prisons and Disciplinary Hearing Officer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vegel v. Dewalt
as 5:2008cv00157
Plaintiff:
Tina Vegel
Defendant:
Stephen Dewalt
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Moon v. Dewalt et al
as 5:2008cv00140
Petitioner:
Anthony Lawayne Moon
Respondent:
Stephen Dewalt and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Russell v. Dewalt
as 5:2008cv00139
Petitioner:
Darnell D. Russell
Respondent:
Stephen Dewalt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Belcher v. Dewalt
as 5:2008cv00075
Petitioner:
Stephen Cortez Belcher
Respondent:
Stephen Dewalt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garcia v. United States of America et al
as 5:2008cv00002
Plaintiff:
Pedro Garcia
Defendant:
United States of America, Stephen Dewalt, Adu Boeteng and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Brewer et al v. Dewalt et al
as 5:2007cv00385
Plaintiff:
Trevino Brewer and William Staples
Defendant:
Stephen Dewalt, Rios, Marrero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action
Williams v. County of Forsyth, Georgia et al
as 2:2007cv00119
Plaintiff:
Ernest L. Williams
Defendant:
County of Forsyth, Georgia, Ted Paxton, Penny Penn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
