Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Stephen Karban v. Vivian Baltierra, et al
as 21-15548
Defendant / Appellee:
VIVIAN BALTIERRA, Deputy Warden at Eyman Complex, Cook Unit Prison, CHARLES L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, STEVEN BRENNAN, Corrections Office (Captain) #2304 at Eyman Complex and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN FRANK KARBAN
Karban v. Baltierra et al
as 2:2019cv04377
Defendant:
Ron Lee, Vivian Baltierra, Charles L Ryan and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Frank Karban
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karban v. Ostrander et al
as 2:2017cv03618
Defendant:
J Ostrander and M Smith
Plaintiff:
Stephen Frank Karban
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephen Karban v. Attorney General of the State, et al
as 17-16688
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEPHEN FRANK KARBAN
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA and CHARLES L. RYAN
Karban #234332 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2014cv02763
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Stephen Frank Karban
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stephen Karban v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 13-16056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN FRANK KARBAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Interim Director at Arizona Department of Corrections, SANDRA WALKER, Warden, Tucson Complex at Arizona Department of Corrections, C. MENDOZA, Deputy Warden, Winchester Unit at Arizona Department of Corrections and others
Stephen Karban v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 12-16838
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN FRANK KARBAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Interim Director at Arizona Department of Corrections, SANDRA WALKER, Warden, Tucson Complex at Arizona Department of Corrections, C. MENDOZA, Deputy Warden, Winchester Unit at Arizona Department of Corrections and others
Karban v. Ryan et al
as 4:2010cv00406
Plaintiff:
Stephen Frank Karban
Defendant:
Charles Ryan, Sandra Walker, C Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
