Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Shari Guertin, et al v. MI, et al
as 17-1769
Plaintiff - Appellee: SHARI GUERTIN, individually and as next friend of her child, E.B., a minor, DIOGENES MUSE-CLEVELAND
Defendant: STATE OF MICHIGAN, RICHARD SNYDER, individually and in his official capacity as Governor of Michigan, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY and others
Defendant - Appellant: ROBERT SCOTT, individually, and in his official capacity as an employee of MDHHS
Shari Guertin, et al v. MI, et al
as 17-1752
Plaintiff - Appellee: SHARI GUERTIN, individually and as next friend of her child, E.B., a minor, DIOGENES MUSE-CLEVELAND
Defendant: STATE OF MICHIGAN, RICHARD SNYDER, individually and in his official capacity as Governor of Michigan, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY and others
Defendant - Appellant: NANCY PEELER, individually, and in her official capacity as an employee of the MDHHS
Shari Guertin, et al v. MI, et al
as 17-1745
Plaintiff - Appellee: SHARI GUERTIN, individually and as next friend of her child, E.B., a minor, DIOGENES MUSE-CLEVELAND
Defendant: STATE OF MICHIGAN, RICHARD SNYDER, individually and in his official capacity as Governor of Michigan, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY and others
Defendant - Appellant: LIANE SHECKTER-SMITH, individually, and in her official capacity as Chief of the Office of Drinking Water and Municipal Assistance for MDEQ, DANIEL WYANT, individually, and in his official capacity as Director of MDEQ, STEPHEN BUSCH, individually, and in his official capacity as District Supervisor for MDEQ and others
Shari Guertin, et al v. MI, et al
as 17-1699
Plaintiff - Appellee: SHARI GUERTIN, individually and as next friend of her child, E.B., a minor, DIOGENES MUSE-CLEVELAND
Defendant: STATE OF MICHIGAN, RICHARD SNYDER, individually, and in his official capacity as Governor of Michigan, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY and others
Defendant - Appellant: CITY OF FLINT, MI, a Michigan municipal corporation, HOWARD CROFT, individually, and in his official capacity as Flint's Director of Public Works, MICHAEL GLASGOW, individually, and in his official capacity as an employee of the City of Flint and others
Shari Guertin, et al v. MI, et al
as 17-1698
Plaintiff - Appellee: SHARI GUERTIN, individually and as next friend of her child, E.B., a minor, DIOGENES MUSE-CLEVELAND
Defendant: STATE OF MICHIGAN, RICHARD SNYDER, individually and in his official capacity as Governor of Michigan, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY and others
Defendant - Appellant: EDEN WELLS, individually, and in her capacity as Chief Medical Executive for MDHHS, NICK LYON, individually, and in his capacity as Director of MDHHS
Guertin et al v. State of Michigan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv12412
Plaintiff: Shari Guertin , Diogenes Muse-Cleveland
Defendant: Michigan, State of, Richard Snyder, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Dorlette v. Dave Butkiewicu
as 13-3495
Plaintiff - Appellant: Faroulh Dorlette
Defendant - Appellee: Dave Butkiewicus, Individual &Official Capacity, Jeffrey McGill, Individual &Official Capacity, Brad Guertin, Individual &Official Capacity and others
Foudy et al v. Saint Lucie County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2012cv14462
Defendant: Indian River County Sheriffs Office, Gerald M. Bailey, Julie L. Jones and others
Plaintiff: Toni Foudy , Shaun Foudy
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Perkins v. City of Attleboro et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv11206
Defendant: David Hasslehurst, Stephen Marcotte, City of Attleboro and others
Plaintiff: Dennis Perkins
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Morgan v. Arnone et al
as 3:2011cv01475
Defendant: Mark Tourangeau, Miller, Guertin and others
Plaintiff: Lloyd George Morgan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?