Cases 51 - 60 of 161
Douglas v. Spaulding
as 4:2022cv00862
Petitioner:
Timothy L. Douglas
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Whitlock v. Spaulding
as 1:2022cv00639
Petitioner:
Jovan Whitlock
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
STRAUCHN v. SPAULDING et al
as 1:2022cv00958
Plaintiff:
BARRINGTON STRAUCHN, JR.
Defendant:
STEPHEN SPAULDING, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and COMMERCIAL ACCOUNT #58
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silva v. Spaulding
as 3:2022cv00472
Petitioner:
Shawn A. Silva
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martinez v. Spaulding
as 1:2022cv00470
Petitioner:
Luis Martinez
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Batts v. Spaulding
as 1:2022cv00469
Petitioner:
Joseph Batts
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Payne v. Spaulding
as 1:2022cv00471
Petitioner:
Robert Payne
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gonzalez v. Spaulding
as 4:2022cv00379
Petitioner:
Edward Gonzalez
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hannigan v. Spaulding
as 4:2022cv00152
Petitioner:
Myles J. Hannigan
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramdeo v. Lyn et al
as 5:2022hc02013
Petitioner:
Sonny Austin Ramdeo
Respondent:
Tamara S. Lyn, Warden Stephen Spaulding, Nicole C. English and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
