Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Duarte v. Romero et al
as 5:2022cv00538
Petitioner:
Richard F. Duarte, Jr.
Respondent:
Officer Wilson Romero, Officer FNU Rice, Medical Staff and Practitioners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duarte v. Romero et al
as 5:2022cv00479
Petitioner:
Richard F. Duarte, Jr.
Respondent:
Officer Wilson Romero, Major of Corr. Christy N. Welman, Verneta Davis, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duarte v. Stengel et al
as 5:2021cv00885
Petitioner:
Richard F. Duarte, Jr.
Respondent:
Frank Stengel, State of Texas, Stephen Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Potts v. Tuten et al
as 3:2020cv01409
Defendant:
J D Driskill, Pam Tarbor, Jim Tuten and others
Plaintiff:
Jermichael Potts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Mathis et al
as 6:2020cv00019
Plaintiff:
James Robert Hughes
Defendant:
Ms. Pam Guenther, K Gloor, Mr. Stephen Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2018cv12824
Defendant:
Louisiana State, Unidentified Parties, Robert Rigamer and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Martin and Martin El Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Baughman v. Ron Hickman, et al
as 17-20679
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN KURT BAUGHMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RON HICKMAN, DOCTOR MARCUS GUICE, Medical Doctor, DEPUTY JOHN DOE and others
Langs v. Abbott et al
as 4:2016cv01333
Petitioner:
Larry Don Langs
Respondent:
Gregg Abbott, Ken Paxton and Stephen Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weens v. Stephens
as 5:2016cv00341
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Daniel James Weens
Respondent:
Stephen Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haynes v. Williams
as 4:2016cv00577
Petitioner:
Levi C Haynes
Respondent:
Stephen Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
