Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Duarte v. Romero et al
as 5:2022cv00538
Petitioner:
Richard F. Duarte, Jr.
Respondent:
Officer Wilson Romero, Officer FNU Rice, Medical Staff and Practitioners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duarte v. Romero et al
as 5:2022cv00479
Petitioner:
Richard F. Duarte, Jr.
Respondent:
Officer Wilson Romero, Major of Corr. Christy N. Welman, Verneta Davis, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duarte v. Stengel et al
as 5:2021cv00885
Petitioner:
Richard F. Duarte, Jr.
Respondent:
Frank Stengel, State of Texas, Stephen Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Markham v. Hamilton et al
as 6:2021cv00030
Defendant:
Detar North Hospital, Corp. Justan Diaz #232, VDP H Watlems #4150 and others
Plaintiff:
Elena Markham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00136
Defendant:
J.B. Hunt, LLC, J.B. Hunt Gas & Oil Drilling, LLC, Kevin Favant and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hughes v. Mathis et al
as 6:2020cv00019
Plaintiff:
James Robert Hughes
Defendant:
Ms. Pam Guenther, K Gloor, Mr. Stephen Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00144
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Stephen William Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Langs v. Abbott et al
as 4:2016cv01333
Petitioner:
Larry Don Langs
Respondent:
Gregg Abbott, Ken Paxton and Stephen Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weens v. Stephens
as 5:2016cv00341
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Daniel James Weens
Respondent:
Stephen Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haynes v. Williams
as 4:2016cv00577
Petitioner:
Levi C Haynes
Respondent:
Stephen Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
