Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24782
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24790
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24784
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24788
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Mario Moya v. Officer Sterling Jackson, et al
as 23-13446
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARIO MOYA
Defendant / Appellee: STERLING JACKSON and CITY OF CHAMBLEE, GEORGIA
Hope et al v. City of Ocala, Florida et al
as 5:2023cv00606
Plaintiff: Sterling Hope, III and Bonnie Hope
Defendant: City of Ocala, Florida and Natawi Chin
Not Classified By Court: Donna Doyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02268
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Warren v. CorrectHealth Clayton, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv03608
Plaintiff: Quennel D. Warren
Defendant: CorrectHealth Clayton, LLC, CorrectHealth, LLC, Millenia Medical Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00507
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Caplan v. STERLING TIRE INC. et al
as 0:2023cv60709
Plaintiff: Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant: STERLING TIRE INC. and Ravenswood Warehouses LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?