Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Vaughan et al v. Wardhaugh et al
as 4:2023cv02879
Plaintiff:
Matthew V. Vaughan and Amy A. Vaughan
Defendant:
Russell L. Wardhaugh, Amanda N. Wardhaugh, Castlewood Brokers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Schilling Livestock et al v. Umpqua Bank et al
as 6:2014cv00054
Plaintiff:
Schilling Livestock , Kenneth A. Schilling and Lesley R. Schilling
Defendant:
Umpqua Bank and Sterling Bank
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
In re: Williams, Love, O'Leary, & Pow, et al v. Heather Brann
as 12-36064
Debtor:
In the Matter of: WILLIAMS, LOVE, O'LEARY, & POWERS, PC
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILLIAMS, LOVE, O'LEARY, & POWERS, PC
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
STERLING BANK
Defendant - Appellant:
HEATHER A. BRANN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv11940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv10853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv10768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv10420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv10419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Estes v. Sterling Bank et al
as 4:2011cv02335
Plaintiff:
Dennis L Estes
Defendant:
Sterling Bank , Chernosky, Smith, Ressling & Smith, PLLC, Raymond Naudin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Decriscio et al v. American Sterling Bank et al
as 2:2010cv00983
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Decriscio and Rebecca A. Decriscio
Defendant:
American Sterling Bank, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems , BAC Home Loans Servicing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
