Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Tompkins v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 5:2018cv01251
Defendant:
Kristopher Wade Vlosich, Robert Wilkie, Department of Veterans Affairs and others
Plaintiff:
John Tompkins
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Simpson et al v. United States of America, et al
as 1:2018cv01169
Defendant:
Faraz Sandhu, Jeffrey Neidhart, Steve Young and others
Plaintiff:
Tammy Simpson and Marvin Charley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Young, et al. vs. Son, et al.
as 6:2014cv01154
Plaintiff:
Steve Young and Eun J. Young
Defendant:
Ki Ok Son, Hye Jin Son and Across Construction Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clay v. John Lilley Correctional, et al
as 13-6286
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BLADE CLAY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN LILLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STEVE YOUNG, Chief of Security, John Lilley Correctional Center and others
Bell v. Oklahoma DOC, et al
as 13-7030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE T. BELL
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JUSTIN JONES, PHILLIP LANGSTON, Chief Medical Administrator and others
Bell v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2013cv00063
Plaintiff:
Joe Thomas Bell
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Justin Jones, Phillip Langston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schell v. Jones, et al
as 12-6267
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK RYAN SCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, EDWARD L. EVANS, Warden, SHARON MCCOY and others
Schell v. Jones et al
as 5:2012cv00866
Plaintiff:
Derek Ryan Schell
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Edward L Evans, Sharon McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Butterfield et al
as 1:2012cv00077
Plaintiff:
Gil A. Miller
Defendant:
Jacob Butterfield, Gerd Young, Steve Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754
Ramada Worldwide Inc. v. Kim et al
as 4:2010mc00028
Plaintiff:
Ramada Worldwide Inc.
Defendant:
Steve Young Kim and Young Soon Kim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
