Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Mackey Jr. v. Sheriff
as 3:2026cv01368
Petitioner:
Steven E Mackey, Jr and Steven Edward Mackey, Jr
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOWLING v. SAMPSON
as 2:2026cv00602
Petitioner:
STEVEN BOWLING
Respondent:
VIRGINIA SAMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hecke v. USA
as 1:2026cv00400
Petitioner:
Steven J Hecke
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Heavilin v. Carrols Corporation et al
as 4:2026cv00077
Plaintiff:
Steven Heavilin
Defendant:
Carrols LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
DENO v. HENDERSON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 1:2026cv01574
Plaintiff:
STEVEN DENO
Defendant:
HENDERSON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NANCE v. JACKSON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2026cv00191
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW STEVEN NANCE
Defendant:
JACKSON COUNTY JAIL, JAIL STAFF and MEDICAL STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON v. BILL et al
as 1:2026cv01515
Plaintiff:
STEVEN M. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
BILL, BURRIS and HOLLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENO v. HENDERSON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2026cv01520
Plaintiff:
STEVEN DENO
Defendant:
HENDERSON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and HENDERSON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER MEDICAL (WESTERN KENTUCKY CORRECTIONAL CARE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
