Cases 1 - 10 of 15
United States of America v. Hernandez (Rodriguez Camacho)
as 21-1469
Defendant:
Antonio Feliciano, AKA Tony, AKA Guess, Jose Antonio Hernandez, AKA Tony and Mayra Aponte
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Steven Camacho, AKA Spank, AKA Spanko and Jaime Rodriguez, AKA Jay
Camacho v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv10512
Plaintiff:
Steven Camacho
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Camacho v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv10410
Plaintiff:
Steven Camacho
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Baker et al v. The Everest Hotel Group, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00390
Plaintiff:
Bradley Crowe, Katina Murray, Latee Baker and others
Defendant:
Rajumaanar Enterprises Corp., Beth Anne Smith, Sunny Khan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 18-459
Petitioner - Appellant:
Steven Camacho
Petitioner:
Jaime Rodriguez
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 18-457
Petitioner - Appellant:
Jaime Rodriguez and Steven Camacho
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Camacho et al v. Rajumaanar Enterprises Corp. et al
as 3:2017cv01181
Plaintiff:
Katina Murray, Cara Pascucci, Latee Baker and others
Defendant:
Rajumaanar Enterprises Corp., Sunny Khan and Rajumaanar Enterprises Corp. doing business as Perkins Restaurant & Bakery
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Camacho v. USA
as 1:2014cv04846
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Steven Camacho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Camacho v. Warden et al
as 6:2014cv00655
Plaintiff:
Steven Camacho
Defendant:
Warden, John Does 1-8 and Jane Does 1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camacho v. Warden et al
as 8:2014cv01019
Plaintiff:
Steven Camacho
Defendant:
Warden, John Does 1-8 and Jane Does 1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
