Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Gilbert v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2025cv00369
Plaintiff:
Steven Dwayne Gilbert
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and Charlie Valdez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilbert v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2025cv00360
Plaintiff:
Steven Dwayne Gilbert
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and Charlie Valdez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilbert v. Widner
as 25-40009
Petitioner:
Steven Dwayne Gilbert
Respondent:
Kenny Widner, Jasper County Jail Administrator and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Gilbert v. Newman et al
as 1:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Steven Dwayne Gilbert
Defendant:
Mitch Newman, Lana Lee and Jasper County Correction Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilbert v. Newman et al
as 1:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
Steven Dwayne Gilbert
Defendant:
Mitch Newman and Jasper County Correctional Center
Petitioner:
Terry Lewis Brooks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilbert v. Livingston et al
as 1:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Steven Dwayne Gilbert
Defendant:
Brad Livingston and Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilbert v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2018cv00299
Petitioner:
Steven Dwayne Gilbert
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gilbert v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2018cv00248
Petitioner:
Steven Dwayne Gilbert
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gilbert v. Livingston et al
as 4:2015cv01319
Plaintiff:
Steven Dwayne Gilbert
Defendant:
Brad Livingston and Board Of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
