Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hynes et al v. Forde & O'Meara LLP et al
as 3:2023cv01140
Plaintiff:
Brian F Hynes, Vendor Assitance Program, LLC, Blue Stone Finance, LLC and others
Defendant:
Forde & O'Meara LLP, Michael K. Forde, Leonard Trial Lawyers LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
USA et al v. a.One ATV Yamaha Raptor 700, 2BG00 Y-6; et al
as 3:2020cv01273
Defendant:
b.One ATV Apollo Commander, L08AGJ2DOJ1000186;, p.Jewelry, Gold Color Necklace with a Charm Milany;, y.Jewelry, Gold Color Necklace with one round shaped charm; and others
Plaintiff:
USA and i.iPhone (Gold), Green & Clear Cover;
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
Arelius Capital Master, Ltd. et al-
as 3:2017cv01886
Plaintiff:
Arelius Capital Master, Ltd. , ACP Master, Ltd , Aurelius Convergence Master, Ltd and others
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and Financial Oversight Management Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Concrete Innovation Services, L.L.C. v. Esan Precast, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01713
Plaintiff:
Concrete Innovation Services, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Esan Precast, Inc., Puerto Rico Stone, Inc., Puerto Rico Stone & Fences, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Cemex de Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Ductor, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv02254
Plaintiff:
Cemex de Puerto Rico, Inc.
Defendant:
Ductor, Inc., Anchor Stone Company, Inc. and AnGar PR, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Byzantine Industries, LLC v. Tiles & Stones of P.R., Inc.
as 3:2008cv01537
Plaintiff:
Byzantine Industries, LLC
Defendant:
Tiles & Stones of P.R., Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ERROR - NOT USED
as 3:2008cv01538
Plaintiff:
Byzantine Industries, LLC
Defendant:
Tiles & Stones of P.R. Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
