Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Stovall v. Chaptelain, et al
as 16-1286
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL STOVALL
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN CHAPTELAIN, Warden and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Stovall v. Chaptelain et al
as 1:2016cv00618
Petitioner:
Michael Stovall
Respondent:
John Chaptelain and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hulse et al v. Adams County, Colorado et al
as 1:2014cv02531
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Hulse and Kelly McCain
Defendant:
Adams County, Colorado, Michel Miller, Christopher Gruenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stovall v. Raemish
as 1:2014cv02069
Plaintiff:
Joel Stovall
Defendant:
Raemish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stovall v. Lind
as 1:2014cv01700
Petitioner:
Joel Stovall
Respondent:
R. Lind
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Medina v. Adams County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 1:2014cv00988
Plaintiff:
Eddie Medina, Jr.
Defendant:
Adams County Sheriff Dept., David Lereke and Jeffrey Stovall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv01390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 5:2007cv03243
Petitioner:
Jan F Becker
Respondent:
Bob Hudson, Liz Dole, Pat Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yaklich v. Grand County, et al
as 05-1563
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT YAKLICH
Defendant - Appellee:
GRAND COUNTY, a Political Division of the State of Colorado, by and through its BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF GRAND, COLORADO, ROBERT ANDERSON, in his official capacity, DUANE DAILEY, in his official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
