Cases 21 - 30 of 104
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv09507
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Viguet v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv08792
Plaintiff:
Thomas Paul Viguet, Jr.
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation and Stryker Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv07857
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
In re: Stryker Corporation, et al
as 17-20510
Petitioner:
In re: STRYKER CORPORATION, STRYKER SALES CORPORATION, MAKO SURGICAL CORPORATION and others
Respondent:
PPD ENTERPRISES, L.L.C.
King v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 2:2017cv07382
Plaintiff:
Bernard King
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation and Stryker Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mirage IP LLC v. Stryker Corporation
as 2:2017cv00384
Plaintiff:
Mirage IP LLC
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Morris v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv02529
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Morris
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation , Stryker Sales Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sandberg v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 1:2017cv00030
Plaintiff:
John Sandberg
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corporation, Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Depreo et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 2:2017cv00122
Plaintiff:
Eido Depreo and Eileen Depreo
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corporation, Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00416
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Withdrawal of Reference
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
