Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Whittenberger v. LaVoie et al
as 2:2023cv01589
Plaintiff:
Leroy R Whittenberger
Defendant:
Daniel LaVoie, Barry Daughtry, Melissa McFarlane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leroy R. Whittenberger v. Daniel Winkleski, et al
as 23-3106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEROY R. WHITTENBERGER
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL WINKLESKI, ROSLYN HUNEKE, TAMMY STURMNESS and others
Gardipee v. Brown County Sheriff et al
as 2:2023cv00728
Plaintiff:
Richard Thomas Gardipee
Defendant:
Brown County Sheriff, Brown County Jail, Anthony Evers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Whittenberger, Leroy v. Winkleski, Daniel et al
as 3:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Leroy R. Whittenberger
Defendant:
Daniel Winkleski, Roslyn Huneke, Tammy Sturmness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rausch Sturm LLP v. Job
as 2:2022cv00077
Defendant:
Kevin A. Job, Kevin-Arthur and Kevin A Job
Plaintiff:
Rausch Sturm, LLP and Rausch Sturm LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
John Burton v. Portfolio Recovery Associates,, et al
as 21-2686
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN H. BURTON
Defendant / Appellee:
PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC and RAUSCH STURM ISRAEL ENERSON & HORNIK, LLP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
