Other Statutes Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ronald Emrit v. Charles Barkley, et al
as 23-1275
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant: CHARLES BARKLEY, FANDUEL and SUBWAY
Ronald Emrit v. Charles Barkley, et al
as 23-1276
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee: CHARLES BARKLEY, SUBWAY and FANDUEL
Ronald Emrit v. Charles Barkley, et al
as 23-1271
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee: CHARLES BARKLEY, SUBWAY and FANDUEL
Emrit v. Barkley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00079
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant: Charles Barkley, Subway and FanDuel
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
EMRIT v. BARKLEY et al
as 2:2023cv00034
Plaintiff: RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant: CHARLES BARKLEY, SUBWAY and FANDUEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
EMRIT v. BARKLEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00156
Plaintiff: RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant: CHARLES BARKLEY, SUBWAY and FANDUEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
ROSEMAN v. SUBWAY SANDWICH SHOPS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv00793
Plaintiff: ANDREW ROSEMAN
Defendant: SUBWAY SANDWICH SHOPS, INC. and DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC. v. PATEL et al
as 1:2013cv00386
Plaintiff: DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC.
Defendant: RAVI PATEL and SUBWAY SOUTH STAR ASSOCIATES
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC. v. SINGH et al
as 3:2011cv01077
Plaintiff: DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC.
Defendant: AMRIK SINGH and FREEHOLD SUBWAY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Doctors Assoc Inc, et al v. Jesal Desai, et al
as 08-8061
Defendant - Petitioner: JESAL DESAI, AKA Jesal A. Patwari, PATWARI LLC, SHAPAT II and others
Plaintiff - Respondent: DOCTORS ASSOC INC and SUBWAY REAL ESTATE CORP

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?