Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Emrit v. Barkley et al
as 3:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Charles Barkley, Subway and FanDuel
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
EMRIT v. BARKLEY et al
as 2:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
CHARLES BARKLEY, SUBWAY and FANDUEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
EMRIT v. BARKLEY et al
as 2:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
CHARLES BARKLEY, SUBWAY and FANDUEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv02604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
COMMONWEALTH REALTY COMPANY, L.P. v. SUBWAY REAL ESTATE LLC et al
as 5:2016cv06573
Plaintiff:
COMMONWEALTH REALTY COMPANY, L.P.
Defendant:
SUBWAY REAL ESTATE LLC and SUBWAY REAL ESTATE CORP.
Thirdparty_defendant:
RAGHUVIR CHAVDA
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
SUBWAY REAL ESTATE LLC and SUBWAY REAL ESTATE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Reyes v. MVPGB, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv01649
Plaintiff:
Francisca Reyes
Defendant:
MVPGB, LLC and Subway Sandwich & Salads
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ROSEMAN v. SUBWAY SANDWICH SHOPS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv00793
Plaintiff:
ANDREW ROSEMAN
Defendant:
SUBWAY SANDWICH SHOPS, INC. and DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
THOMPSON v. DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC. et al
as 2:2011cv07749
Plaintiff:
NICOLE THOMPSON
Defendant:
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC. , SUBWAY FAN, INC., AVONDALE SUBWAY CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
