Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Ramirez v. Keyser
as 24-918
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY RAMIREZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM F. KEYSER, Supt. of Sullivan Correctional Facility
Scharkey v. Bennett
as 24-600
Petitioner:
JAMES SCHARKEY
Respondent:
S. BENNETT, Superintendent, Sullivan Correctional Facility
Robertson v. Sullivan Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv01365
Plaintiff:
Erick Robertson
Defendant:
Sullivan Correctional Facility, Superintendent William Keyser, DSP A. Justiniano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Warden
as 23-7156
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, WARDEN, Sullivan Correctional Facility and Ward
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDGAR WILSON
Thomas v. Jacobs
as 22-512
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Thomas
Defendant / Appellee:
Officer E. Jacobs, Sgt. Miller, Superintendent William Keyser and others
Wilson v. Warden, Sullivan Correctional Facility
as 7:2022cv00701
Plaintiff:
Edgar Wilson
Defendant:
Sullivan County Correctional Facility
Respondent:
Warden, Sullivan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrews v. All of the officers in E-North et al
as 1:2021cv10518
Plaintiff:
Eric Andrews
Defendant:
All of the officers in E-North and Sullivan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. All of the officers in E-North et al
as 9:2021cv01191
Plaintiff:
Eric Andrews
Defendant:
All of the officers in E-North and Sullivan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz v. Superintendent of Sullivan Cor
as 21-2235
Petitioner:
Nelson Cruz
Respondent:
Superintendent of Sullivan Correctional Facility
Macaluso v. Keyser
as 21-72
Petitioner / Appellant:
Vincent Macaluso, Jr.
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of New York
Respondent / Appellee:
William F. Keyser, Superintendent Sullivan Correctional Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
