Cases 1 - 10 of 12
SUMPTER v. THE HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv02707
Plaintiff:
ERIC SUMPTER
Defendant:
THE HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
SUMPTER v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv04231
Plaintiff:
SYLVIA ANN SUMPTER
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SUMPTER v. PENN PLAZA
as 2:2017cv00385
Plaintiff:
RUEBEN SUMPTER, JR.
Defendant:
PENN PLAZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SUMPTER-IRWIN v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02925
Plaintiff:
GRETCHEN S. SUMPTER-IRWIN
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SUMPTER v. COLVIN
as 5:2013cv00988
Plaintiff:
NICHOLE SUMPTER
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SUMPTER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv50886
Plaintiff:
LLOYD SUMPTER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SUMPTER v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72752
Plaintiff:
LLOYD SUMPTER
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALM v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv68121
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND SUMPTER
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., ACANDS, INC., ACANDS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SUMPTER v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66693
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND SUMPTER
Defendant:
A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
A.H. BENNETT COMPANY and S.O.S. PRODUCTS
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PONTON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2008cv05014
Plaintiff:
TROY PONTON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ERNEST BROWN, BRIAN SUMPTER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
