Cases 41 - 50 of 129
Perez et al v. Kum Gang Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02095
Defendant:
Ji Sung Yoo, Kum Gang Inc. and Kum Gang Inc. doing business as Kum Gang San
Plaintiff:
Pascual Garcia, Leonardo Palax and Melvin Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nelson et al v. Turntable, LLC et al
as 8:2018cv00824
Plaintiff:
Marc Nelson , Talis Petropoulous and Elizabeth Fessel
Defendant:
Turntable, LLC and Sung Y Kim
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jeri v. Great Neck Cleaner & Hand Laundry, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01089
Plaintiff:
Jorge Jeri
Defendant:
Great Neck Cleaner & Hand Laundry, Inc. and Sung Ho Cho
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Yoo v. Studio of Master's Touch, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00281
Plaintiff:
Sung Teak Yoo
Defendant:
Studio of Master's Touch, Inc., David Jang and In Jae Moon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Kim v. Polo Deli, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv07389
Plaintiff:
Bu Sung Kim
Defendant:
Mi Kyung Kim, Sang Tae Kim and Polo Deli, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Perez et al v. 50 Food Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv07837
Plaintiff:
Esteban Perez , Felipe Galindo and Delfino Perez
Defendant:
50 Food Corp. and Andrew Sung
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SUNG v. VILLAGE SUPER MARKET OF NJ, LP et al
as 2:2017cv05033
Plaintiff:
JUNG-HUA SUNG
Defendant:
VILLAGE SUPER MARKET OF NJ, LP , VILLAGE SUPER MARKET INC. , TOM DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Kim et al
as 3:2017cv01067
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Beaverton Sushi Inc., Camas Sushi LLC, Green Lake Sushi LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ohr v. PAS LLC
as 1:2017cv04500
Petitioner:
Peter Sung Ohr
Respondent:
PAS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Weddle et al v. SH LEE, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01432
Plaintiff:
Heather Weddle and John Arnold
Defendant:
SH LEE, LLC and Sung Ho Lee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
