Cases 1 - 9 of 9
RAUSO v. MARTINEZ et al
as 2:2017cv04721
Plaintiff:
GENNARO RAUSO
Defendant:
ANGELA MARTINEZ, DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF JUDICIAL SUPPORT FOR THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DELAWARE COUNTY, PA, MARY MCFALL HOPPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NAVARRETE v. OWENS et al
as 2:2016cv01474
Plaintiff:
ADAN NAVARRETE
Defendant:
CLIFFORD OWENS and SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WRIGHT v. SUNTRUST BANK, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv05633
Plaintiff:
JARET WRIGHT
Defendant:
SUNTRUST BANK, INC., SUNTRUST INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC., SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC. v. BUSBY et al
as 2:2012mc00192
Plaintiff:
SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC.
Defendant:
DONALD B. BUSBY, DEANNA DAVIS, ROBERT G. RONK and others
TORRES v. SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv00565
Plaintiff:
DEBRA TORRES
Defendant:
SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC. , TRANS UNION, LLC and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
THURMOND et al v. SUNTRUST BANKS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv01352
Defendant:
SUNTRUST BANKS, INC. , SUNTRUST BANK , SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER THURMOND , KATHY MULL , DIANE FORREST and others
Stefanowicz v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv02103
Plaintiff:
Jackie Stefanowicz
Defendant:
Suntrust Mortgage, Inc., Lisa Khelfa and Maria Koenig
Cause Of Action: Diversity
LORAH et al v. SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC. et al
as 5:2008cv00703
Plaintiff:
JAMIE H. LORAH and DONNA L. LORAH
Defendant:
SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
JONES et al v. ABN AMRO MORTGAGE GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv04328
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS A. JONES and ANDREA M. JONES
Defendant:
ABN AMRO MORTGAGE GROUP, INC., CHASE HOME MORTGAGE CORPORATION, CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
