Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Wallace v. Cain
as 22-60048
Petitioner / Appellant:
Antonio Daniel Wallace
Respondent / Appellee:
Superintendent Andrew Mills and Superintendent Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections
Page v. Mills
as 21-60789
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jerry Page
Respondent / Appellee:
Superintendent Andrew Mills
Bernard v. Mills
as 3:2021cv00491
Plaintiff:
Willie Bernard
Defendant:
Superintendent Andrew Mills
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Mills
as 1:2021cv00109
Petitioner:
Timothy A. Williams
Respondent:
Superintendent Andrew Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carter v. Mills
as 3:2021cv00428
Defendant:
Superintendant Andrew Mills
Plaintiff:
Dwaliues Deon Carter
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moffite v. Mills
as 3:2021cv00290
Plaintiff:
Derrick Dewayne Moffite
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Superintendent Andrew Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ward v. Mills
as 4:2021cv00045
Respondent:
Superintendent Andrew Mills
Petitioner:
Alphonso Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shaun Brame v. Thomas J. Dart, et al
as 11-1028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAUN BRAME
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, Cook County Sheriff, in his individual and official capacities, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Executive Director, in his individual and official capacities, SUPERINTENDENT ANDREWS, Cook County Jail, in his individual and official capacities and others
Antonio Blanchard v. Superintendent Andrews, et al
as 10-3709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO L. BLANCHARD
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ANDREWS, D. HOWELL, Chief #117, CAPTAIN DARCY and others
Paul Taylor v. Superintendent Snooks, et al
as 09-2203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL D. TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT SNOOKS, SUPERINTENDENT MCGUIRE, SUPERINTENDENT ANDREW and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
