Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Chamberlin v. Alves
as 4:2023cv40036
Plaintiff:
Peter Mark Chamberlin
Defendant:
Superintendent Nelson B Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reddicks v. Alves
as 1:2023cv10455
Petitioner:
Charles Reddicks
Respondent:
Superintendent Nelson B Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frazier v. Alves
as 1:2022cv11967
Petitioner:
Antonio R. Frazier
Respondent:
Superintendent Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Concepcion v. Alves et al
as 1:2022cv11703
Petitioner:
Raymond Concepcion
Respondent:
Superintendent Nelson Alves and Attorney General Maura Healey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ferreira v. Alves
as 1:2022cv11352
Petitioner:
Antonio M. Ferreira
Respondent:
Superintendent Nelson B Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Alves
as 1:2022cv11147
Petitioner:
Cornelius Brown
Respondent:
Superintendent Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
West v. Alves
as 1:2022cv11044
Petitioner:
Steven West
Respondent:
Superintendent Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huang v. Alves
as 1:2022cv10903
Petitioner:
Da Lin Huang
Respondent:
Superintendent Nelson Alves and Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freiberg v. Alves
as 1:2022cv10751
Petitioner:
Richard S Freiberg
Respondent:
Superintendent Nelson B Alves and Nelson B Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wampler v. Alves
as 1:2021cv11982
Petitioner:
Larry D. Wampler, Jr. and Hung Tan Vo
Respondent:
Superintendent Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
