Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Gaines v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv20169
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., MCKESSON CORPORATION and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
Susan Gaines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gaines v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv02696
Defendant:
Merck & Co, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Gaines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diss et al v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv20074
Plaintiff:
Joseph Engolia, Cecil Campbell, Victor Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., MCKESSON CORP. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diss et al v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv01800
Plaintiff:
Joseph Engolia, Cecil Campbell, Victor Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc., McKesson Corp. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014mc02056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014mc02055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Washington v. LVNV Funding LLC et al
as 7:2014mc02054
Plaintiff:
Willie Mae Washington
Defendant:
LVNV Funding LLC and Susan Gaines
Miscellaneou:
Benjamin G Cohen and Bankruptcy Clerk
David Sutton, Jr. v. Robert Piper, et al
as 08-2377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID SUTTON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT S. PIPER, Designed Officer/Agent of Piper Realty Company, SUSAN GAINES, Property Manager, MARY O'BRIEN, On Site Property Manager and others
Sutton v. Hendrickson et al
as 2:2007cv14897
Plaintiff:
David Sutton, Jr
Defendant:
Paul C Hendrickson, Robert S Piper, Susan Gaines and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
