Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Susan Polgar v. USA Chess Federation, Inc.
as 10-10220
Plaintiff-Counter Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN POLGAR
Defendant-Counter Claimant - Appellant:
SAM SLOAN
United States of America Chess Federation, Inc. et al v. Polgar et al
as 5:2009cv00246
Plaintiff:
United States of America Chess Federation, Inc., United States of America Chess Federation, Inc., United States of America Chess Federation, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Susan Polgar, Susan Polgar, Susan Polgar and others
Mediator:
Daniel Bowling and Robin W. Siefkin
Counter Defendant:
Bill Goichberg, Karl S Kronenberger, Randy Bauer and others
Counter Claimant:
Susan Polgar, Susan Polgar, Susan Polgar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal
United States of America Chess Federation, Inc. v. Polgar et al
as 3:2009cv03069
Plaintiff:
United States of America Chess Federation, Inc., United States of America Chess Federation, Inc. and United States of America Chess Federation, Inc.
Defendant:
Susan Polgar and Hoainhan Truong
Cause Of Action: Diversity
United States of America Chess Federation, Inc. et al v. Polgar et al
as 3:2008cv05126
Plaintiff:
United States of America Chess Federation, Inc., United States of America Chess Federation, Inc., United States of America Chess Federation, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Susan Polgar, Susan Polgar, Susan Polgar and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Polgar v. United States of America Chess Federation Inc et al
as 5:2008cv00169
Plaintiff:
Susan Polgar
Defendant:
United States of America Chess Federation Inc, United States of America Chess Federation Inc, United States of America Chess Federation Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
PARKER v. SLOAN et al
as 2:2008cv00829
Plaintiff:
GORDON ROY PARKER
Defendant:
SAMUEL H. SLOAN, WILLIAM GOICHBERG, CONTINENTAL CHESS ASSOCIATION and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
