Cases 1 - 10 of 32
SWANN v. IND DEPT. OF CORR et al
as 1:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE SWANN
Defendant:
IND DEPT. OF CORR, CHRISTINA REAGLE, JAMES BASINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SWANN v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2023cv01942
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE SWANN
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, KIDD, RUNYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swann et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq03216
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Mary Swann and Quentin Swann
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Does 1 through 60 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SWANN v. CARTER et al
as 1:2023cv01068
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE D. SWANN
Defendant:
JASON CARTER, HOLLY DENMAN and CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SWANN v. BYRD et al
as 2:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE SWANN
Defendant:
BYRD, BOBBIE RIGGS and DANIEL BEDWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gorbey v. Harris et al
as 2:2022cv02262
Plaintiff:
Michael Gorbey
Defendant:
Scott . Harris, Clayton R Higgins, Jr, United States Supreme Court Judges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
SWANN v. BYRD et al
as 2:2022cv00488
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE SWANN
Defendant:
SAMUEL J. BYRD, KIM HOBSON, BOBBIE RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swann v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv06037
Plaintiff:
Kia L. Swann
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SWANN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE SWANN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, CHRISTIE, BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SWANN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE SWANN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, JERRY SNYDER, CHARLES DUGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
