Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Johnson v. Richland County Jail et al
as 9:2022cv00475
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Richland County Jail, Christopher Blunk, James Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sweat v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 7:2021cv07685
Plaintiff:
Inetha Sweat
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Sweat-Kennedy v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00848
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Sweat Kennedy and Yolanda Sweat-Kennedy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Esthmon E. Sweat v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 6:2020cv06101
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Esthmon E. Sweat, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Roberta L. Sweat (Deceased)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harper et al v. Karabeles et al
as 7:2018cv02647
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Harper and Kevon Sweat
Defendant:
Taso Karabeles and Town of Newburgh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sweat v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv00391
Plaintiff:
Davora Sweat
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jackson et al v. Skehill et al
as 1:2015cv04987
Defendant:
Kristi Skehill, Bernard Solomon, John and/or Jane Does Nos. 1, 2, 3, etc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dytrel Jackson , Ryan Owusu , Marcus Sweat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sweat v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv03911
Petitioner:
Ramu Sweat
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sweat v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv03937
Petitioner:
Ramu Sweat
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sweat v. USA
as 3:2012cv00947
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Craig Sweat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
