Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Bogushevich v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00313
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC and Timothy Roberts
Plaintiff:
Igor Bogushevich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Tedrow v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC et al
as 6:2018cv01609
Plaintiff:
Joy Tedrow
Defendant:
Arthur Thomas Rambo, Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC and Godwin Chukwuemeka Eze
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heikes v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 3:2017cv01940
Defendant:
Auto Injury Solutions, Inc., Virgil Hudgins, Mark S. Kavelman and others
Counter Defendant:
Kaaren Heikes and Kaaren Heikes
Plaintiff:
Kaaren Heikes
Cross Defendant:
Virgil Hudgins
Counter Claimant:
Mark S. Kavelman, Mark S. Kavelman, Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC and others
Cross Claimant:
Mark S. Kavelman and Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Evenson v. Swift Transportation Company et al
as 3:2017cv01215
Plaintiff:
Darrick Evenson
Defendant:
Swift Leasing Co., LLC, Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, Swift Transportation Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
House et al v. Shaffer et al
as 3:2011cv00249
Plaintiff:
Brian House and Christen House
Interested Non-Party:
PacificSource Health Plans
Defendant:
Warren Evan Shaffer, Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC and Swift Transportation Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
