Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd. v. Syntax-Brillian Corp.
as 2:2008cv03933
Plaintiff:
Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd.
Defendant:
Syntax-Brillian Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
TECO Electric & Machinery Co., Ltd. v. Syntax-Brillian Corp.
as 2:2008cv01105
Plaintiff:
TECO Electric & Machinery Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Syntax-Brillian Corp.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bloomfield, Inc. v. Syntax-Brillian Corp. et al
as 2:2008cv00236
Plaintiff:
Bloomfield, Inc., Bloomfield, Inc. and Bloomfield, Inc.
Defendant:
Syntax-Brillian Corp., Vincent Sollitto, Jr, James Li and others
Movant:
New Haven Policemen and Firemen's Pension Fund, City of
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Tsirekidze v. Syntax-Brillian Corp., et al
as 2:2007cv02204
Plaintiff:
Teimuraz Tsirekidze
Defendant:
Syntax-Brillian Corp., Vincent F. Solitto, Jr. and Wayne Pratt
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
IMCA, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv05348
Plaintiff:
IMCA, Inc.
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Defrancisco v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv05020
Plaintiff:
Mauricio Defrancisco and Mauricio Defrancisco
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Eisler v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv05019
Plaintiff:
Scott Eisler
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Weingarten v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv04931
Plaintiff:
Marcia Weingarten, Marcia Weingarten, Marcia Weingarten and others
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Pulasky v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv04934
Plaintiff:
John Pulasky
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Feser v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv04074
Plaintiff:
Gail Feser
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
